Adolescent Cannabis Study (02-19-01)
Summary: The Center for
Substance Abuse Treatment
(CSAT) has published the results of a comprehensive multi-site research study on
the treatment of adolescents with marijuana problems. From 1992 to 1998
the number of adolescents presenting for substance abuse treatment in the public
system has increased by 53%. This represented a 115% jump in
marijuana related admissions. Marijuana is now the leading substance
(exceeding even alcohol) mentioned in adolescent substance abuse treatment
admissions, emergency room admissions and autopsies. Over 80% of substance
abusing adolescents are treated in outpatient settings. As a result, five approaches
to outpatient treatment were tested in community based treatment centers.
The study showed that treatment outcomes were dramatically improved between
intake and three months post-treatment. these improvements included:
(1)
Significant increases in the percentage of adolescents reporting no
past-month use (4% to 34%); (2) Significant increases in those
reporting no past-month abuse or dependence symptoms (19% to 61%); and
(3)
A 31% decrease in the rate of any substance use between the three
months before and after treatment. This
is better than in all prior studies of adolescent outpatient substance abuse
treatment in community settings. All five approaches yielded a better
outcome than traditional treatment methods in similar programs for similar
clients. This increased effectiveness of all five approaches is attributed
to the study's critical ingredients: (1) the use of standardized treatment
manuals; (2) the systematic training and supervision of staff using the
manuals; and (3) the use of systematic quality assurance that measured outcomes
and gave feedback to clinical staff.
<Go
To CYT Study On SAMHSA Website>
<Go To GORSKI-CENAPS Website>
News Story
From the Mid-Atlantic Addiction Technology Transfer Center
Funded by Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, SAMHSA
Reference: Addiction
Exchange, The Newsletter of the Mid-Atlantic Addiction Technology
Transfer Center, Volume 3, No. 3: CSAT's Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT)
Study, February 19, 2001
CSAT's Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) study was conducted
in some of the nation's leading community- based treatment systems and medical
centers, this was one of the largest randomized field experiments conducted to
date. Preliminary findings suggest that all five approaches to outpatient
treatment have done better than evaluations of existing practice and are
affordable. Below is some more background on the study, its findings, and how to
find out more or get the treatment manuals.
From 1992 to 1998 the number of adolescents presenting for
substance abuse treatment in the public system has increased by 53%, including a
115% jump in marijuana related admissions; marijuana is now the leading
substance (exceeding even alcohol) mentioned in adolescent substance abuse
treatment admissions, emergency room admissions and autopsies (Dennis, Noursi,
& Muck, in press). While over 80% of these adolescents are treated in
outpatient settings, evaluations of existing practice have produced mixed
results and been plagued by a myriad of methodological problems.
Following recommendations from the Institute of Medicine
(Lamb et al., 1998) and other experts, the field has focused on developing
treatment protocol manuals to improve practice. In particular, the Center for
Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) funded CYT study to identify five of the most
promising approaches to adolescent outpatient treatment, develop manuals for
their implementation in community based settings, and evaluate them in the
largest (n=600) multi-site randomized field experiment ever conducted with this
population <Go
To CYT Study On SAMHSA Website>
The sites used for the study were:
·
Chestnut Health Systems in Bloomington and Madison County, IL,
·
The University of Connecticut Health Center in Farmington, CT,
·
Operation PAR in St. Petersburg, FL, and
·
The Child Guidance Center in Philadelphia (now called Children's
Hospital of Philadelphia).
The five treatments ranged in
model, duration, modality (e.g, individual, group), degree of family involvement
and cost.
According to Dr. Michael Dennis,
Principal Investigator for the study and chair of the CYT Steering Committee,
the study's findings showed that overall, all five of the study's approaches are
more effective than current practice, with some significant differences
appearing to emerge in their effectiveness. "The thing that intrigued me
the most was that they all worked so much better than existing practice,"
Dennis said. He attributed their effectiveness to the study's
"critical ingredients," which were that they all had treatment manuals
and focused a great deal on quality assurance. This was done by changing
the duties of the clinical supervisors from mostly paperwork to actual
involvement in the clinical protocols. Each supervisor initially sat in on or
taped each counselor's sessions off and on for an average of six to eight
months, until they felt the counselor had mastered the study's clinical
techniques. The staff loved it, said Dennis, because they felt they were getting
a lot more out of clinical supervision. "This isn't training," said
Dennis, "this is change."
The study's treatment outcomes
improved dramatically between intake and three months post-treatment.
The improved outcomes included:
·
Significant increases in the percentage of adolescents reporting
no past-month use (4% to 34%) and
·
Significant increases in those reporting no past-month abuse or
dependence symptoms (19% to 61%).
·
A 31% decrease in the rate of any substance use between the three months
before and after treatment. This is
better than in all prior studies of adolescent outpatient treatment in community
settings.
There were significant
differences found by type of treatment, problem severity, and their interaction.
However, most of these differences were minor compared to the overall
improvement in practice and the fact that their average cost per week ($105 to
$244) was similar to that reported by outpatient adolescent program directors.
"Which treatments are used in practice," said Dennis, "is more
likely to vary based on organizational staffing and resources."
CYT finished its field work in
February, 2001. Preliminary analysis reveals that the assessment and five
treatment protocols all worked much better than existing practice. The CYT
assessment and treatment are being released to the field this spring via CSAT (www.samhsa.gov/csat
) and NCADI (1-800-SAY-NOTO).
NOTE: The Mid-ATTC is offering a
related online course, Issues in Substance Abuse Treatment for Adolescents,
which begins February 26. For more information, visit our web site at www.mid-attc.org
and go to Training & Education -> Online Courses.
Go to http://www.mid-attc.org/wwwboard/wwwboard.shtml
to discuss this topic on the Addiction Exchange Forum.
We hope you find Addiction
Exchange useful in your work. Please let us know about your information needs by
emailing the editor of Addiction Exchange at mid-attc@mindspring.com, or discuss
your training needs by contacting us by email or telephone at (804)-828-9910.
Visit the Mid-ATTC website at http://www.mid-attc.org.
Please copy and
distribute to your colleagues and students!!!!
GORSKI-CENAPS
Better Treatment To more People At A Lower Cost